This is not fair!
The rule is that when passing an exam with a 5.5 means you’re excluded from a resit. But students who score a 5.4 get a second attempt and can score up to a 10. For students who passed, but want to excel/improve, there is no chance. Is this fair?
Doesn’t it just stimulate ‘strategic’ exam making? Wouldn’t it be more fair to score max 6.0 at the resit. Or let all students >4.0 take resit?
Dear righteous teacher,
You are right, no fair! But this is one of those nasty debates that cannot be satisfactorily resolved. Allowing resits for everyone might seem more fair, but I bet this will invite students who did well the first time to try again and beat themselves. And who needs more students to burn out? And another point of discussion: a maximum grade for resits, how killing is that for motivation of students to learn and improve their performance?
My advice: choose your battles S. This isn’t really even your battle but the students’. If they need your help they’ll find it. Meanwhile, you do for them what they cannot do for themselves and teach!
If you want to comment, please login on the left side of the page with your UU account..
De Universiteit Utrecht gaat onderzoeken of studenten worden achtergesteld door het strenge herkansingsbeleid dat studenten niet toestaat voldoendes te herkansen. Dat bevestigde rector Henk Kummeling vorige week tijdens een commissievergadering van de Universiteitsraad. Lees het artikel in de Dub: https://www.dub.uu.nl/nl/nieuws/worden-utrechtse-studenten-achtergesteld-door-de-strenge-herkansingsregels